Puzzled by the latest piece of marketing propaganda being thrown around by the anti-2nd Amendment lobby:
“No one wants to take away your guns.”
This is often followed by comments about how the gun movement has made people become paranoid and think this way and that advocates need to lighten up and compromise.

Well, just for those people who seem to be truly unaware or have not actually read the laws and proposed laws.

YES, THEY DO WANT TO “TAKE OUR GUNS”.

The Feinstein proposal calls for an across of the board BAN on a huge number of the best selling, most popular and widely held guns, it also calls for a limit on the magazine size AND on severe limits on how one can buy or sell their own property.

Magazine size is a standard and integral part of the functionality of firearms. For example the Beretta 92 was used at one point as a replacement to the Colt 1911 as the standard handgun sidearm for troops – perhaps the most common handgun on earth. It is still widely used worldwide. This Beretta handgun has a 15 round magazine and sacrifices caliber size versus the 1911 style in exchange for more rounds. Under Feinstein’s law this common handgun and thousands like it is considered an “illegal assault weapon” because of the magazine size. Same goes for putting a flashlight or handle on the most simple family rifle.

In New York, the law ALREADY passed goes one step further in calling for people to turn in their own weapons! Pending legislation in Massachusetts would make tens of thousands of people criminals. Yes. They ARE coming to take our guns and anyone who says otherwise is either misinformed or is lying. The extremely clever marketing of the anti-2nd Amendment crowd is designed to make the severe and draconian restrictions and proposals seem reasonable. What reasonable person wouldn’t want to eliminate “assault weapons”? Well the term is just an invented term and really means “all the most functional and best selling weapons as well as those scary-looking ones we can possibly get rid of”.

Please educate yourself on the issue.

You can definitely be a pacifist, non-aggressionist and own guns: MLK did, there are pacifists who knew defense was the only answer against the march of evil.

However you cannot be a pacifist and wish to seize guns because seizing someone’s property is itself an act of violence, backed by threat or carried out aggression by those who are armed.

Sen Feinstein seeks to do violence against millions of Americans and is one of the most violent people we have seen in politics. Click ‘like’ and share if you think she’ll have a hard time.